Dave Giles, 47, missed a flight at Copenhagen after passport kiosks slowed a queue, leaving him and his family about £1,800 out of pocket. Hundreds of travellers reported delays of up to three hours and some missed departures after the EU's new Entry-Exit System began operating across Schengen states on Friday. The scheme, rolled out gradually since October 2025, now covers 25 EU member states alongside Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. Passengers told of fingerprint scanners failing, repeated registrations and little staff help at kiosks, leaving families, pregnant travellers and elderly passengers stuck in long queues.

The first full day of operation for the EU Entry-Exit System, known as EES, produced a rush of complaints from people passing through passport control in major European airports.

Long queues and missed departures

Some travellers said they waited for hours at border checks. Airport officials reported delays of up to three hours on some routes. A reader response to a callout produced hundreds of accounts. Many described queues that moved slowly or stopped entirely.

One traveller who missed a flight was Dave Giles, 47, an IT manager from Raunds in Northamptonshire. He had been in Copenhagen with his family for a music festival and arrived at the airport hours before departure. Giles said there were roughly 80 to 100 people ahead of him and only three passport kiosks in use. One kiosk shut while the queue was moving, he said, and a supervisor tried to get the gate held open. The gate closed just seconds before Giles reached the front, and the family were denied boarding.

The cost to Giles was immediate. He paid for new flights the next day, a hotel room, extra parking at Stansted and a hire car to reach the later flight at a different airport. He said receipts added up to about £1,800 and that insurance and the airline had declined liability.

Problems with kiosks and biometric checks

Several travellers described biometric issues at the kiosks. Fingerprints were sometimes rejected. Families found the process harder when travelling with children. Multiple people said they had to repeat registration at different legs of their journeys, despite already completing the steps earlier on the trip.

Staff either had no explanation or were not visible on the desks where passengers sought help.

A London-based passenger who asked to be identified only as Georgia reported a four-hour wait on arrival at Pisa on 10 April. She said there was no staff in sight to advise about waiting times and that people with infants received no special assistance. Pregnant and elderly passengers, she added, had to sit on the floor or stand in a hot, windowless corridor.

Mastheads

How the EES was introduced

The EES has been phased in since October 2025 and went into force across the Schengen area on Friday. The system replaces the traditional stamp on passports for many non-EU short-stay visitors and records biometric data at entry and exit. Officials say the aim is to strengthen border control by tracking stays and preventing unlawful overstays, but the rapid switch to the new processes has created logistical pressure at border points.

On the practical level, the EES requires travellers to use kiosks or automated gates to register. Where the equipment or staffing levels aren't enough, queues build. Several readers said there was little guidance on using the machines when they reached them, which slowed throughput.

Effects on British passengers and travel industry links

The disruption hit UK travellers directly. Giles and other respondents named UK airports and travel arrangements in their accounts. Giles had to reroute between Heathrow and Stansted and incurred transport and accommodation costs as a result. That left him doubtful about reimbursement from insurers or carriers.

For airlines and airports, the immediate effect is passenger disruption. Missed flights and long waits mean extra rebookings, customer-service demands and potential reputational damage. For travellers, the effects have been both financial and physical. People with mobility needs, infants or pregnancies reported particular hardship during the delays.

Public frustration also landed on the frontline staff. Passengers described scarce staff presence at kiosks and at passport control desks. Where staff were visible, they often couldn't resolve technical problems quickly. A supervisor in one airport was reported to have made calls to hold a gate, but couldn't stop a departure in time.

There are several concrete ways the problems matter beyond individual inconvenience. First, the accounts show immediate financial losses for travellers. Giles documented about £1,800 in extra costs. That figure is a clear, measured loss tied to the system's early faults.

Second, the delays impose costs on carriers and airports. Each missed flight requires administrative work and may leave aircraft underused. Passengers who reroute contribute to last-minute demand spikes at other airports. Those are operational realities that can translate into higher costs or lower punctuality across networks.

Third, political attention is likely to follow where national travellers are affected. UK passengers are among those reporting problems. That creates pressure for Britain-facing carriers and travel operators to raise concerns with European authorities and with airport operators. The accounts describe travellers seeking answers from airports. Some have emailed airport authorities and sought refunds, while insurers have, in at least one reported case, declined to pay.

Finally, the rollout highlights the importance of staffing and training when introducing new border technologies. Where automated systems aren't matched by human support, delays can multiply. The experience of passengers in this weekend's roll-out shows the practical consequences of a technology-led change without matching operational capacity on the ground.

Passengers reported that staff were aware of delays but often unable to fix the technical or logistical issues in time to prevent missed flights. Where supervisors intervened, the results were mixed. Several travellers said they received no clear guidance at kiosks, and some had to repeat the registration process on subsequent legs without explanation.

These firsthand accounts suggest short-term fixes would include more staff at arrivals and departures, clearer signage and assistance at kiosks, and contingency plans for travellers with reduced mobility or infants. Those steps are operational rather than legal or policy changes, and they're the kinds of adjustments airports and carriers can make immediately.

Related Articles

Giles said he had emailed the airport and didn't expect reimbursement for roughly £1,800 in expenses.

This article was created with AI assistance.