The Bank of England has kept its key interest rate steady at 3.75%, signalling caution amid mounting uncertainty caused by the ongoing conflict in Iran. The war has disrupted global energy markets, threatening to prolong inflationary pressures and make the central bank’s efforts to stabilise prices.

Interest Rates Held Amid Rising Inflation Risks

The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) unanimously voted to maintain the main interest rate at 3.75% in its latest meeting. This was the first consensus among all nine members in over four years, reflecting a shared unease about the economic fallout from the Middle East conflict. Until the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran in late February, many had expected the Bank to begin cutting rates as inflation seemed poised to ease toward its 2% target.

But the escalation in hostilities and subsequent surge in oil and gas prices have upended those expectations. The conflict threatens to push inflation higher than predicted, with the Bank warning it could climb to 3.5% this summer due to increased energy costs. Governor Andrew Bailey emphasised the importance of patience, stating that holding rates steady is the prudent course while the situation unfolds.

Energy Markets Remain Volatile as Strait of Hormuz Threatens Supply

At the heart of the Bank’s concerns is the strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of the world’s crude oil passes. The war has already seen attacks on critical oil and gas infrastructure, including Qatar’s massive Ras Laffan liquefied natural gas facility. Such assaults have caused sharp price spikes and intensified fears of prolonged disruption.

Megan Greene, an MPC member, warned that even if the conflict ended tomorrow, the damage to energy markets would linger. She described it as “wildly optimistic” to expect prices to normalise quickly, given the threat that Iran could arbitrarily close the strait or impose tolls on passing vessels. This risk premium is now baked into global energy costs, making a swift return to pre-war price levels highly unlikely.

Potential for Lasting Inflationary Pressure

The Bank is watching closely for signs of second-round effects, where higher energy prices feed through into wages and broader price increases. Greene noted that households and businesses might react more swiftly this time, having endured the inflation shocks from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

However, a weaker economy and labour market may temper these pressures somewhat, complicating predictions.

Still, the risk remains that persistent energy price shocks could entrench inflation above target for longer than anticipated. The Bank’s previous forecasts for 2026 now appear uncertain, with higher prices expected to weigh on growth and delay any easing of borrowing costs.

Financial markets have responded with caution, reflecting doubts over the outlook.

Broader Global Context and Central Banks’ Responses

The Bank of England isn't alone in grappling with the fallout. The US Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank also paused rate changes recently, citing the conflict as a major source of uncertainty. The ECB described the outlook as “significantly more uncertain,” highlighting the widespread economic risk.

Energy price shocks have repeatedly tested central banks over the past few years, from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to now the Middle East tensions. Each episode makes their balancing act between controlling inflation and supporting economic growth. The Bank of England’s decision to hold rates reflects this delicate position, as it tries to avoid premature moves that could destabilise the fragile recovery.

Meanwhile, political voices in the UK have criticised the government’s preparedness. The shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accused ministers of leaving the country vulnerable to energy price surges sparked by the war, raising questions about policy readiness for such shocks.

Related Articles

As the conflict in Iran persists, the Bank of England faces a tough balancing act. The war’s impact on energy markets and inflation could last well beyond the immediate crisis, complicating monetary policy decisions and the UK’s broader economic outlook for years to come.

This article was created with AI assistance.